Re: The Stacy Keibler general thread - part 11

by LornaDoone Sat 23 Feb 2013, 22:09

I think if those with children can learn any lesson here - it's that you have to guide them closely to make better choices. I know it's difficult when they see their peers doing some of these things.

I was walking to my car one morning and a young girl probably either in middle school or perhaps first year of high school, seemed to have been appropriately dressed to go to school.

Next thing I see, she and her friends duck behind our garages, they make a half-hearted attempt to shield her from anyone viewing from the street and she proceeds to strip and change into a pair of daisy duke type shorts and a tight t-shirt.

So for her parents, when she left the house she was dressed appropriately. But by the time she got to school, she was dressed as a teenage s-l-u-t.

What bothers me is that the schools don't fight harder to show the parents what is really going on and why the parents aren't insisting that these kids are made to wear appropriate clothing at school (and are held accountable if they don't.)

I think with the age of the internet - the choices you make MUST be more carefully considered. Those pictures of Stacy will NEVER go away. But I do agree, it is like beating a dead horse. Nothing she can do about the past but what will she do with her future?

Cindigirl, I understand the point you made. We all have a past. But I can tell you - the ill advised choices I may have made when I was younger did not involve me taking my clothes off for ANYONE to photograph. And that included boyfriends I had.

I think as time goes on we seem to continue to be chipping away at moral values. As each generation continues to die off, old mores seem to die off with them. What is scandalous to one generation just elicits a shrug of the shoulders of another.

As to George, I think he gets off the hook too often. He talks about women's rights but then he dates the same type of woman.

Someone commented that Sarah was interviewed saying that she and George spoke about marriage. But in reality, George knows that he probably wouldn't be very good at marriage because then he would lose control of the situation. Just the idea of a true partnership with a woman who would also have the legal right to make decisions about their life, is not something George will ever entertain as long as he's focused on his career.

You see, I think George knows you can't take it with you. His issue is that he hasn't achieved that one goal (whatever that might be) that is most important to him with his career, therefore, until he does (or if he never does) he won't entertain being in a relationship with someone who would have a good amount of say as to how he spends his time. Or better put - would have more expectation of him not spending so much time on his career if it continually drew him away from his family life. And by family I mean the woman. I just don't see him with children no matter what his marital status.

by OofOof Sat 23 Feb 2013, 22:18

Lorna, you are wonderful. The voice of reason.

by The next mrs clooney Sat 23 Feb 2013, 22:19

OofOof wrote:Not liking Stacy is one thing--hey everyone is entitled to their own opinion and I actually agree with some of what's been said here-- but to suggest something other than the fact that they're obviously in close quarters is going a bit far, in my opinion. He's doing her makeup while the other guy does her hair. It looks perfectly innocent to me, if not a little uncomfortable.

I'm just tired of every photo coming from this job involving hair and makeup people. Seems like almost every photo on her Twitter site involves makeup and hair people and stylists. I want pics with George and all the other famous people she's meeting thanks to G. Cough 'em up Stace!

Its not going far its stating the truth. If she sat up straight in the chair the make up artist would be able to get closer to her face. Seems there is plenty of space behind her also. There is no work situation when it would be acceptable to have your legs wrapped around someone and have yoru crotches touching (well except maybe in porn)!! It is inappropriate to even touch people at work in the US. lawsuits are based on less than this.

by The next mrs clooney Sat 23 Feb 2013, 22:20

by OofOof Sat 23 Feb 2013, 22:23

Lorna said nothing about that photo of Stacy and the makeup/hair crew. She was commenting in general about Stacy and her past--the conversation that preceded the tweet.

I just think getting worked up about the photo is a whole lot of hooey about nothing, but that's my opinion. Your views on what she did as a wrestler, I actually agree with in part. Suggesting she's doing something wrong here with her makeup guy seems a bit petty.

by very vera Sat 23 Feb 2013, 22:27

it is not petty... It's not about the photo . it's about her and how she just doesn't think. there's a word for this... indescretion
what if george saw it what would he think??

by The next mrs clooney Sat 23 Feb 2013, 22:30

OOF oof please dont refer to me as petty as that is insulting to me and the rules are that you cant insult others. The photo is wrong and this is not the way make up artists do their work. I have a friend who is a make up artist and I texted him the picture. he was shocked. They are not allowed to touch any part of the person other than the place they are applying make up. Also they dont sit down to apply make up as it affects the lighting. He said that the person in this picture could loose his job if he was seen doing this.

by OofOof Sat 23 Feb 2013, 22:30

Really?! You really think the man who seems to select the women he hooks up with from the pages of Maxim is going to think anything about that photo other than she's wearing way more clothes than he'd like?

by The next mrs clooney Sat 23 Feb 2013, 22:31

very vera wrote:it is not petty... It's not about the photo . it's about her and how she just doesn't think. there's a word for this... indescretion
what if george saw it what would he think??

Bravo Vera glad to see there is someone on this forum that still has some sense Very Happy

by OofOof Sat 23 Feb 2013, 22:34

I am very sorry if I offended you but it really does seem like you're searching for anything and everything to find fault with Stacy. I did not call you petty, I said I thought it was petty to nitpick that photo.

As far as whether or not having makeup put on in that manner is correct, you've got me on that one. I don't have a friend in the makeup biz so had no idea there were rules on how makeup should be applied on sets.

How bout this...let's call a truce on this one instead of turning yet another non issue into a huge argument. It was a picture on her twitter page for goodness sake. You think it is disgusting. I think it's just plain boring. Period.

by very vera Sat 23 Feb 2013, 22:34

I agree no insulting.

thank you i try to make sense... sometimes

by Dior Sat 23 Feb 2013, 22:34

Nothing to do with pettiness.

She just can't help to spread her legs in front of a camera.

by party animal - not! Sat 23 Feb 2013, 22:37

Don't want to pour oil on troubled waters but wasn't her jokey caption alluding to lack of space?

by theminis Sat 23 Feb 2013, 22:39

A gentle reminder that name calling whether its towards another poster or someone in George's life is breaking the House Rules - last time I checked stupid is not a compliment.

So lets please move on and get back on topic....

by The next mrs clooney Sat 23 Feb 2013, 22:40

OofOof wrote:I am very sorry if I offended you but it really does seem like you're searching for anything and everything to find fault with Stacy. I did not call you petty, I said I thought it was petty to nitpick that photo.

As far as whether or not having makeup put on in that manner is correct, you've got me on that one. I don't have a friend in the makeup biz so had no idea there were rules on how makeup should be applied on sets.

How bout this...let's call a truce on this one instead of turning yet another non issue into a huge argument. It was a picture on her twitter page for goodness sake. You think it is disgusting. I think it's just plain boring. Period.

by saying my actions are petty you are saying I am petty. I really dont need to search hard to find fault with Stacy she hands it to everyone on a "twitter" platter!!

by very vera Sat 23 Feb 2013, 22:42

we are on topic this is the stacey keibler thread and we are talking about stacey ... right???

by The next mrs clooney Sat 23 Feb 2013, 22:46

very vera wrote:we are on topic this is the stacey keibler thread and we are talking about stacey ... right???

i thought we were but apparently you are only on topic if you are saying nice things about Stacy.

Now I remember why I dont spend much time on here anymore, time for me to take my sabbatical from the Stacy keibler fan club Sleep

by very vera Sat 23 Feb 2013, 22:51

theminis wrote:A gentle reminder that name calling whether its towards another poster or someone in George's life is breaking the House Rules - last time I checked stupid is not a compliment.

So lets please move on and get back on topic....

I agree with TNMC here. this seems to be the asskiss1

for stacy section. if any one wants to have a real conversation let me know

by theminis Sat 23 Feb 2013, 22:57

The next mrs clooney wrote:
very vera wrote:we are on topic this is the stacey keibler thread and we are talking about stacey ... right???

i thought we were but apparently you are only on topic if you are saying nice things about Stacy.

Now I remember why I dont spend much time on here anymore, time for me to take my sabbatical from the Stacy keibler fan club

Nowhere did I ask for anyone to only say nice things about Stacy, that's just ridiculous. My suggestion to stay on topic (yes Im aware Stacy is the topic) was made because it was clear to me that this discussion was getting personal in an unpleasant way.

by theminis Sat 23 Feb 2013, 23:23

My mom sent me this card to remind me that I was once that kid who used to hang upside-down.… [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
— Stacy Keibler (@StacyKeibler) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

by Lighterside Sat 23 Feb 2013, 23:25

noodle wrote:I'm not sure if he let's them know up front or not. It bothers me that all of them seem to think after a while that they are "the one". It makes me think he's giving them a reason to. I remember an interview with Sara Larson after the split. She said they talked about marriage often and had plans to get married. I hope he doesn't lead them on that way.

I'm sure they "talked" about marriage often...as in "it's never going to happen"... anything beyond that kind of conversation took place in her "dreams"... Zzzzz

hahahahaha

by Dior Sat 23 Feb 2013, 23:30

The persons who are getting personal in an unpleasant way are always those, who are defending Keibler.

They answer your comments with a personal attack. But they do this for a reason as they have no arguments and need to detract from the subject.

Unfortunately they are in the majority here...

by OofOof Sat 23 Feb 2013, 23:40

Dior and TNMC: I am not an apologist for Stacy. In fact, if you look back at my posts, you'll see, more often than not, I actually agree with much of what you say.

I draw the line on attacking her on her appearance as the IMDB nut does on a regular basis. (I'm not accusing either of you of doing that) I've never responded to any of yours or others posts in a rude manner, and if you felt I was being rude I apologize.

My point with the photo was simply I saw nothing wrong with it. I guess I just don't understand the emotion that goes with anything to do with Stacy. I didn't even know who she was before I came to COH--had never heard of her! I don't think many people, with the exception of those who were WWE fans or who watched DWTS had ever heard of her before George.

While I don't think she's someone I have anything in common with, I don't think she's the Devil's spawn either. I frankly think of her as Barbie and mostly not at all. And I just think it's sad that she seems to engender so much anger on this forum. I think I will simply stop posting for a bit since you seem to get upset by anyone who disagrees with you.

by Dior Sat 23 Feb 2013, 23:51

"I think I will simply stop posting for a bit since you seem to get upset by anyone who disagrees with you."

Don't be silly, if I got upset by anyone who disagrees with me, I would have died here from a heart attack way before you signed on.

by party animal - not! Sat 23 Feb 2013, 23:52

O-o, don't do that! Let's have balance please.

by Dior Sat 23 Feb 2013, 23:59

As soon she's back at work we get the tweet flood *sigh*.

by Missa Sun 24 Feb 2013, 00:42

That pic is a little weird. She's not nine feet tall; if she just sat straight up in that chair I'm pretty sure the hairstylist could still reach her hair and the makeup guy would have room to work in front of her. Just seems unnecessary to me.

by Mazy Sun 24 Feb 2013, 01:22

Lorna you said
I was walking to my car one morning and a young girl probably either in middle school or perhaps first year of high school, seemed to have been appropriately dressed to go to school.

You are right these are brats, but if they become victims you can not blame them. It matters not how a girl/women is dressed does not give anyone the right to harm them.

As for George
Someone commented that Sarah was interviewed saying that she and George spoke about marriage.

Maybe they did and I think in my opinion, his part of the conversation was No, No, No.
He is not going to cause problems for himself by making anyone of them think he will marry them. There are always a dozen or so that are waiting for him to be free.

I personally think that Stacy is old enough make her own choices. I do feel that since she has been with George she is doing much better. She is trying to get past WW days, it does not matter whether I agree with her choices or not. Like I said I am not all that fond of her, I do not expect her to live up to my expectations. What I tell mine, try not to do anything that you have a hard time living with also they have to live up to there expectations of themself not mine. I personally feel very blessed that none of my many mistakes are recorded anywhere.

What I am trying to point out is yes you have to watch your kids and guide them the best you can. However we should not have to lock them up somewhere so nothing will happen to them. None of the female victims are asking for it or deserve what happens to them. Also George cannot be blame for things that he apparently does not do. JMHO
Zen

by LornaDoone Sun 24 Feb 2013, 01:25

Missa wrote:That pic is a little weird. She's not nine feet tall; if she just sat straight up in that chair I'm pretty sure the hairstylist could still reach her hair and the makeup guy would have room to work in front of her. Just seems unnecessary to me.

You all are probably missing the most important point - the makeup guy is most likely gay (not that I know for sure but often more than not) so Stacy spreading her legs could all be just a moot point.

I agree with theminis, could we move on from this one picture? I think everyone here has stated their opinions about it, there doesn't seem to be any consensus to be gained and I'm sure we'll all have much more to talk about when we see her dress tomorrow at the Oscars!

I for one can't wait and am counting down the hours till they step onto the red carpet. Very Happy

by LornaDoone Sun 24 Feb 2013, 01:31

Mazy wrote:Lorna you said
I was walking to my car one morning and a young girl probably either in middle school or perhaps first year of high school, seemed to have been appropriately dressed to go to school.

You are right these are brats, but if they become victims you can not blame them. It matters not how a girl/women is dressed does not give anyone the right to harm them.

Oh Mazy, I didn't mean to imply that I would blame them if they became victims, not my point at all. I just find it disturbing that the parents are shown one thing - an appropriately dressed teenager and then probably due to peer pressure, she changed before going to school.

As for George
Someone commented that Sarah was interviewed saying that she and George spoke about marriage.

Maybe they did and I think in my opinion, his part of the conversation was No, No, No.
He is not going to cause problems for himself by making anyone of them think he will marry them. There are always a dozen or so that are waiting for him to be free.

And I agree with you and I think it was Dior (both of you making me laugh out loud by the way) that if there was discussion about marriage it was George running away from it with his fingers in his ears yelling, No Way Jose! :-)

by Mazy Sun 24 Feb 2013, 02:46

Lorna this is a little bit touchy with me right now because they want to knock down VAWA in the House. If I over reacted, Sorry.
Make happy

by LornaDoone Sun 24 Feb 2013, 02:49

Mazy wrote:Lorna this is a little bit touchy with me right now because they want to knock down VAWA in the House. If I over reacted, Sorry.

no worries Very Happy

by lovelylois Sun 24 Feb 2013, 03:52

From Twitter- don't know if it was posted

Stacy Keibler ‏@StacyKeibler
#fingerscrossed #oscars [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Expand

by melbert Sun 24 Feb 2013, 04:45

LL, it's posted about in the middle of page 6 on this thread along with the picture.

by Katiedot Sun 24 Feb 2013, 04:47

Here you go. Is she crossing her fingers that she gets to go or that George's film wins?

melbert wrote:Well, there ya go...

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
— Stacy Keibler (@StacyKeibler) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

by melbert Sun 24 Feb 2013, 04:48

My bet is the getting to go option!

by playfuldeb Sun 24 Feb 2013, 05:01

As for getting her hair done; if I had a boyfriend I wouldn't sit that way, but then that's just me

As for nude pics of SK, yes, they are out there. The Gag Report has some pretty explicit crotch shot videos of SK. Just google nude Stacy Keibler and you will get your links. In my opinion, some pornagraphic links. Maybe these are photoshopped videos, dunno, but I refuse to watch so I'll never know.

Can you imagine, tho, living your life in a way that puts you in the spotlight where you'd want to be, doing things for money so you can keep a roof over your head and eat, and then ten years later these things come back to haunt you when you start dating the hottest guy in Hollywood? You gotta wonder if she doesnt mentally beat herself up sometimes.

by Katiedot Sun 24 Feb 2013, 05:09

I don't think she did these things to keep a roof over her head. I think she did them because it's a route to being a celeb. A well-travelled route at that, especially in the past 10 years.

by madsky Sun 24 Feb 2013, 06:17

It is a well worn path to stardom or "celebritydom" that doesn't work for everyone. I think Stacy realized pretty quickly that she wasn't going to get where she wanted the talent route, so she decided to make the most of her ass - ets and her long legs.

Is it just me or does it look like it to anyone that Stacy either just got the invite from George? Or maybe she is just dying to make sure we all know?

I know he has been out of the country, but the girl does seem the need to let the world know they are a couple.

by Katiedot Sun 24 Feb 2013, 06:36

Perhaps. Or maybe she's just excited and wants to share the news with her fans?

ETA - I don't think George gets post at his house. I have a feeling that it gets delivered to his office, opened and sorted there, then passed on to him.

by Picachu Sun 24 Feb 2013, 08:36

playfuldeb wrote:As for getting her hair done; if I had a boyfriend I wouldn't sit that way, but then that's just me

You don't need a boyfriend to know that's just not the way to sit, a proper lady would never ever sit that like, it's disgusting

by theminis Mon 25 Feb 2013, 22:38

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Now doesn't she look happy - with George's Oscar

by Picachu Mon 25 Feb 2013, 22:43

And something she will never own herself

by theminis Mon 25 Feb 2013, 22:48

Along with another thousand or more people in Hollywood, mute point.

by m4rose Mon 25 Feb 2013, 23:18

theminis wrote:Along with another thousand or more people in Hollywood, mute point.

Although I agree with you TheMinis, the mere fact she took a picture holding an Oscar George worked hard for and making it seem as if she won it, just makes me sad. But I guess I am in the minority as usual. Rolling Eyes

by theminis Mon 25 Feb 2013, 23:25

Hi M4Rose
We all look at pictures differently I guess, I just see someone who is smiling and perhaps holding the Oscar because she's proud of George....If that was my partner's Oscar I too would get a picture with it, how many times would you get that chance.

by m4rose Mon 25 Feb 2013, 23:28

I would definitely take a picture with it but WITH the actual winner. Not by myself. I know George would not pose for a twitter picture most likely but I just find it weird. I'll stop now and just go back to reading.

by Dior Mon 25 Feb 2013, 23:37

m4rose wrote:
theminis wrote:Along with another thousand or more people in Hollywood, mute point.

Although I agree with you TheMinis, the mere fact she took a picture holding an Oscar George worked hard for and making it seem as if she won it, just makes me sad. But I guess I am in the minority as usual.

I join the minority.

by theminis Mon 25 Feb 2013, 23:42

m4rose wrote:I would definitely take a picture with it but WITH the actual winner. Not by myself. I know George would not pose for a twitter picture most likely but I just find it weird. I'll stop now and just go back to reading.

Good point you made M4Rose , a picture of them both holding the Oscar would have been good to see, guess they are keeping that one for their private collection.

by noodle Tue 26 Feb 2013, 00:16

But George always tells people in interviews that he makes visitors to his home hold his oscar and make an acceptance speech. I remember a picture of Walter Cronkite doing just that.
I just don't think she has evil intent with every breath she takes.

by Sponsored content