Log in

I forgot my password

Latest topics
» Surbicon wrap party Friday night....4.12.16
Today at 08:11 by Sevens

» The Serious Side
Today at 02:46 by Sevens

» December 2016 Chit Chat
Today at 01:06 by Donnamarie

» George to visit Yerevan April 2017 for Aurora Prize 2.12.16
Sat Dec 03 2016, 03:12 by melbert

» Clooney's baby?
Fri Dec 02 2016, 16:51 by amaretti

» November 2016 Chit Chat
Wed Nov 30 2016, 15:49 by ladybugcngc

» Amal in Texas this afternoon 15.11.16
Tue Nov 29 2016, 21:35 by carolhathaway

» George and the stylist from Esquire UK article January 2014
Tue Nov 29 2016, 17:42 by Joanna

» Happy Thanksgiving!!!
Sun Nov 27 2016, 03:58 by ladybugcngc

Our latest tweets
Free Webmaster ToolsSubmit Express

Village Voice v Clooney re: Darfur

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Village Voice v Clooney re: Darfur

Post by watching on Thu Jul 07 2011, 12:19

Reported here in Huffington Post. Village Voice can't be for real, right??

Village Voice, Continuing Its Progressive Attacks On Celebrities Tackling Social Ills, Turns Its Sights On George Clooney and Darfur
Posted: 07/6/11 04:25 PM ET

Village Voice Media, fresh off its triumph putting Ashton Kutcher in his place for trying to bring awareness to the problem of human trafficking, has directed its crosshairs to an even bigger celebrity and a more vexing issue: George Clooney's advocacy against the genocide in Darfur.

"Clooney and his fellow nay-sayers claim that the genocide in Darfur has claimed the lives of 400,000 and rendered more than 2.5 million people homeless," the Voice declared in a vitriolic investigative piece, due to hit newsstands July 7. "And yet, if you do the math, those figures don't hold up. If you look at how many Janjaweed have actually been arrested for, let alone convicted of, murder and rape, or the number of members of Minnawi's SLA brought in for questioning for their alleged slaughter of the Fur tribes, there's been precious few, if any. So, really, how can six or seven people just accused of some shenanigans be guilty of the massacre of 400,000?

"Moreover, if you look at the real-estate sections of local newspapers, you don't see very many homes up for sale in the regions ostensibly affected," the Voice piece continued. "So the number of people who have been displaced by any sort of 'unrest' that may or may not be going on, by sheer logic, must not be anywhere in the area of 2.5 million. More like 200,000 or 300,000. It's really just a statistical blip."

The Voice's trenchant exposé of clueless do-gooders trying to involve themselves in internal Sudanese matters will run concurrent with a glossy, 16-page advertisement spread paid for by Sudan's Ministry of Tourism encouraging Westerners to visit some of the "less murder-y" portions of the African nation.

watching
Practically on first name terms with Mr Clooney

Posts : 2002
Join date : 2011-01-17
Location : A padded cell somewhere

Back to top Go down

Re: Village Voice v Clooney re: Darfur

Post by melbert on Thu Jul 07 2011, 13:49

Is this a joke? Of course no one has been arrested, tried or convicted because that stupid ass leader condones their behavior. And houses for sale? C'mon, they're a poor class that have been forced from their homes, which are probably more like huts. Why do people write this crap?

melbert
George Clooney fan forever!

Posts : 19134
Join date : 2010-12-06
Location : George's House

Back to top Go down

Re: Village Voice v Clooney re: Darfur

Post by Dexterdidit on Thu Jul 07 2011, 14:09

I know I read it the same way Melbert. I doubt there is a huge call for property in an area that goes through the kind of stuff they do. Let's not forget to mention it would be huts not houses. With all the deaths there would be many empty and I doubt most people in these region can even read. The people who wrote this are idiots and don't bother doing any research! It needs to be used for fish and chips at least then it will be usefull.

Dexterdidit
Achieving total Clooney-dom

Posts : 2772
Join date : 2010-12-06
Location : Somewhere in Oz

Back to top Go down

Re: Village Voice v Clooney re: Darfur

Post by premiere on Thu Jul 07 2011, 14:24

It's a satire piece. It's actually kind of clever in a sad, twisted kind of way.

premiere
Clooney Expert

Posts : 274
Join date : 2011-03-31

Back to top Go down

Re: Village Voice v Clooney re: Darfur

Post by Guest on Thu Jul 07 2011, 17:05

Let’s see… During the Civil War here in the states there were plenty of homes for sale. Oh, wait… what I meant to say is there were plenty of home on fire, burned to the ground. Hmmmm… war.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Village Voice v Clooney re: Darfur

Post by sisieq on Thu Jul 07 2011, 19:11

premiere wrote:It's a satire piece. It's actually kind of clever in a sad, twisted kind of way.
Okay, I just went to the Huff Post link and its under the Comedy section. Doesn't matter, I still think its twisted, sick.

sisieq
Training to be Mrs Clooney?

Posts : 2477
Join date : 2010-12-07

Back to top Go down

Re: Village Voice v Clooney re: Darfur

Post by Guest on Thu Jul 07 2011, 19:41

I agree, Sisieq! I have never used this emoticon but I will now! Vomit 1

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Village Voice v Clooney re: Darfur

Post by Sponsored content Today at 10:28


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum