George Clooney's Open House
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Log in

I forgot my password

Latest topics
» George's new project The Department - a series
George Clooney or Saddam Hussein? Why do consumers pay for celebrity possessions? EmptyFri 22 Mar 2024, 09:42 by annemariew

» George Clooney e Amal Alamuddin in Francia, ecco il loro nido
George Clooney or Saddam Hussein? Why do consumers pay for celebrity possessions? EmptySun 17 Mar 2024, 22:18 by party animal - not!

»  Back in the UK
George Clooney or Saddam Hussein? Why do consumers pay for celebrity possessions? EmptyMon 11 Mar 2024, 16:38 by annemariew

» George Clooney makes the effort to show his fans that he appreciates them
George Clooney or Saddam Hussein? Why do consumers pay for celebrity possessions? EmptySun 10 Mar 2024, 21:20 by carolhathaway

» What Happened?
George Clooney or Saddam Hussein? Why do consumers pay for celebrity possessions? EmptyTue 27 Feb 2024, 10:51 by annemariew

» George and Amal in France with new St Bernard puppy
George Clooney or Saddam Hussein? Why do consumers pay for celebrity possessions? EmptyMon 26 Feb 2024, 22:31 by Ida

» George on the Letterman Show
George Clooney or Saddam Hussein? Why do consumers pay for celebrity possessions? EmptyWed 21 Feb 2024, 15:59 by LizzyNY

» George and Amal with a new puppy
George Clooney or Saddam Hussein? Why do consumers pay for celebrity possessions? EmptyWed 14 Feb 2024, 19:14 by benex

» Amal new book on freedom of speech released
George Clooney or Saddam Hussein? Why do consumers pay for celebrity possessions? EmptyTue 13 Feb 2024, 18:49 by party animal - not!

Our latest tweets
Free Webmaster ToolsSubmit Express

George Clooney or Saddam Hussein? Why do consumers pay for celebrity possessions?

Go down

If George Clooney's stuff became available for sale, would you want to buy some of it?

Yes, without a doubt
 
Yes, but only if I could afford it easily
 
I'm not sure
 
No, why would I want his cast offs?
 
 
 
View results

George Clooney or Saddam Hussein? Why do consumers pay for celebrity possessions? Empty George Clooney or Saddam Hussein? Why do consumers pay for celebrity possessions?

Post by Katiedot Tue 15 Feb 2011, 12:34

This is a press release [a real press release for those still following imdb] which makes me wonder whether research grants aren't going to some very odd places nowadays.

Public release date: 14-Feb-2011

Contact: Mary-Ann Twist

George Clooney or Saddam Hussein? Why do consumers pay for celebrity possessions?
A new study in the Journal of Consumer Research sheds some light into why someone would pay $48,875 for a tape measure that had belonged to Jackie Kennedy or $3,300 for Bernie Madoff's footstool.

"Why do people pay money for celebrity possessions?" write authors George E. Newman (Yale University), Gil Diesendruck (Bar-Ilan University), and Paul Bloom (Yale University). "Celebrity items often have little functional value. And because the objects themselves tend to be relatively common artifacts (clothing, furniture, etc.) they are often physically indistinguishable from a number of seemingly identical products in the marketplace."

The authors researched potential explanations for the phenomenon, delving into the concept of "contagion," the belief that a person's immaterial qualities or essence can be transferred onto an object through physical contact. "We were curious to examine the degree to which contagion beliefs may account for the valuation of celebrity items," the authors explain.

In their first study, the authors asked participants how much they would like to own celebrity and non-celebrity possessions. They asked about well-regarded individuals (like George Clooney) or despised individuals (like Saddam Hussein). They measured the dimensions of contagion, perceived market value, and liking of the individual. "For well-liked celebrities, the primary explanation seemed to be contagion—participants expressed a desire to own some of the individual's actual physical remnants," the authors write. In contrast, when the items had belonged to a despised individual, people perceived that the items were potentially valuable to others, but contact with the hated individuals decreased the items' value.

In a second experiment, participants reported their willingness to purchase a sweater owned by someone famous (well-liked or despised). However, the sweater was "transformed" by sterilization or preventing its resale. For well-liked celebrities sterilizing reduced participants' willingness to purchase the sweater, while preventing the resale of the item had a comparably minimal effect. "In contrast, for despised individuals, the pattern was the opposite: removing contact only increased the sweater's value while preventing the sale to others significantly reduced participants' willingness to purchase it," the authors conclude.

###

George E. Newman, Gil Diesendruck, and Paul Bloom. "Celebrity Contagion and the Value of Objects." Journal of Consumer Research: August 2011. Further information: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] To be published online soon

From Eureka
Katiedot
Katiedot
Admin

Posts : 13223
Join date : 2010-12-05

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum